05/19/2015 "We the People" must move Governance to first place; Respect the U.S. Constitution!!!

“We the People (The Bosses and Law Enforcers)” can stop current trends in the United States of America: if we legally use our voices, writings, phone calls, emails, social media postings (tweets, posts, shares, etc.), protests, and votes in fact based truth to change the grave situations in our Democracy!

What is Governance?

Establishment of policies, and continuous monitoring of their proper implementation, by the members of the governing body of an organization (United States). It includes the mechanisms required to balance the powers of the members (with the associated accountability), and their primary duty of enhancing the prosperity and viability of the organization (United States).

In a true effort to stop Shareholders from controlling our government; The Stakeholders,  have said no to the majorities (over 65%) views on the priorities of the Federal Government; or we must file law suits etc.

Our President and Elected Officials have told us that they want true transparency as defined as follows. Is this a bold faced lie?

What is TRANSPARENCY?

A lack of any hidden agendas; with all information being available; full disclosure is minimum for all verified agreements, practices and dealings; free from secrecy.

 

The provision of the U.S. Constitution that gives Congress exclusive power over trade activities among the states and with foreign countries.

 
United States Constitution. Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3, of the Constitution empowers Congress "to regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among several States, and with the Indian Tribes." The term commerce as used in the Constitution means business or commercial exchanges in any and all of its forms between citizens of different states, including purely social communications between citizens of different states by telegraph, telephone, or radio, and the mere passage of persons from one state to another for either business or pleasure.

President Obama you now involved in Collusion, Corruption, Fraud, and QUID PRO QUO with multi-national foreign corporations in methods that will give up the sovereignty of this nation (the United States of America).

“We the People” need to file suit with the United States Department of Justice against President Obama for these crimes.

Mr. President, you could soon be Impeached by Congress; what a legacy! Drop the whole Trans Pacific Partnership! Under:

United States Constitution. Article II. Section 4.

The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.

Elected Officials, since you are not listening to your constituents; they must file legal actions for Collusion, Corruption, Fraud, and Quid Pro Quo with the Attorney General for each state where a member of congress voted yes to TPA (fast track) and plans to vote yes for Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP).

Enough!

Critical Legal Definitions:

What is COLLUSION?

A deceitful agreement or compact between two or more persons, for the one party to bring an action against the other for some evil purpose, as to defraud a third party of his right.

A secret arrangement between two or more persons, whose interests are apparently conflicting, to make use of the forms and proceedings of law in order to defraud a third person, or to obtain that which justice would not give them, by deceiving a court or its officers.

Baldwin v. New York, 45 Barb. (N. Y.) 359; Belt v. Blackburn, 28 Md. 235; Railroad Co. v. Gay. 8G Tex. 571, 26 S. W. 599, 25 L. R. A. 52; Balch v. Beach, 119 Wis. 77, 95 N. W. 132.

What is CORRUPTION?

Illegality; a vicious and fraudulent intention to evade the prohibitions of the law.  Action: Conduct; behavior; something done; a series of acts. The act of an official or fiduciary person who unlawfully and wrongfully uses his station or character to procure some benefit for himself or for another person, contrary to duty and the rights of others.

U. S. v. Johnson (C. C.) 20 Fed. 082; State v. Ragsdale. 59 Mo. App. 003; Wight v. Rindskopf, 43 Wis. 351; Worsham v. Murchison, 00 Ga. 719; U. S. v. Edwards (C. C.) 43 Fed. 07.

What is FRAUD?

Fraud consists of some deceitful practice or willful device, resorted to with intent to deprive another of his right, or in some manner to do him an injury.

As distinguished from negligence, it is always positive, intentional. Maher v. Hibernia Ins. Co.,67 N. Y. 292; Alexander v. Church, 53 Conn. 501, 4 Atl. 103; Studer v. Bleistein. 115 N.Y. 31G, 22 X. E. 243, 7 L. R. A. 702; Moore v. Crawford, 130 U. S. 122, 9 Sup. Ct. 447,32 L. Ed. 878; Fechheimer v. Baum (C. C.) 37 Fed. 167; U. S. v. Beach (D. C.) 71 Fed.160; Gardner v. Ileartt, 3 Denio (N. Y.) 232; Monroe Mercantile Co. v. Arnold, 108 Ga. 449, 34 S. E. 176.

Fraud, as applied to contracts, is the cause of an error bearing on a material part of the contract, created or continued by artifice, with design to obtain some unjust advantage to the one party, or to cause an inconvenience or loss to the other.

Civil Code La. art. 1S47.

Fraud, In the sense of a court of equity, properly Includes all acts, omissions, and concealments which involve a breach of legal or equitable duty, trust, or confidence justly reposed, and are injurious to another, or by which an undue and unconscientious advantage is taken of another.

What is QUID PRO QUO?

What for what; something for something. Used in law for the giving one valuable thing for another. It is nothing more than the mutual consideration which passes between the parties to a contract, and which renders it valid and binding. Cowell. Quid sit jus, et in quo consist it injuria, legis est definire. 

What constitutes right, and what injury, it is the business of the law to declare!